Berg v. Obama

In a case that must have Osama Bin Laden laughing with delight a federal judge in Philadelphia ruled last night that voter(s) do not have the right to question the eligibility of a candidate for the office of President of the United States.

Yes, really. While I question the motives of the plaintiff in this action, this case has shown that there does not exist any sort of official vetting process that ensures candidates are Constitutionally eligible for the highest office in this country.

Next stop, Supreme Court?

Particulars, here. (Bastids at AP)

Tags: , ,

One Response to “Berg v. Obama”

  1. Ted Says:

    Handled right, the Fed District Court throwing out Berg for lack of standing can present a political check-mate “win” on appeal for the anti-Obama side (if not in law, in the Court of Public Opinion). Here’s how: SIMPLY SPREAD AROUND OBAMA’S APPELLATE BRIEF HAVING TO ARGUE AGAINST AN AMERICAN VOTER’S RIGHT TO RAISE THE QUESTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. Should be a PR disaster for the Dems and Obama!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: